Recognize a broader set of strengths
Creativity, practical judgment, curiosity and care all have a place. Nine profiles give people a richer vocabulary for what they bring.
Workforce Details: research data behind Discover and Demand
A job title tells only part of the story. SIM Ventures brings profiles, career verticals and real occupational evidence together to help people discover possibilities they may never have considered.
Our goal is to help learners recognize their strengths, explore what interests them, and choose a direction worth trying.
Loading career possibilities…
Creativity, practical judgment, curiosity and care all have a place. Nine profiles give people a richer vocabulary for what they bring.
Explore familiar fields and discover new ones. Career verticals make it easier to see how different strengths show up across the world of work.
Open a career to see its tasks and source evidence. Start with a possibility, then look closer at what people actually do.
Profiles work in combinations. Explore each one, then see how those traits come together across different career verticals.
Loading profiles…
Choose a field and discover the traits and combinations that show up in its careers.
How often each profile is prominent in this group of careers.
These profile combinations appear together within the same careers.
Charts summarize the career tags in the SIM Ventures working atlas: 2 = substantive, 3 = prominent. They describe the work; career choices remain open. Candidate signals and occupational sources are available in career results.
Choose a profile. Explore a vertical. Take a closer look at a career.
Requirements, skills, education pathways and profile work-demand cues across your collected postings.
SIM Ventures uses a provisional nine-dimension behavioral framework. We examine occupation-specific O*NET tasks and work activities, cross-check real employer descriptions, and document human scoring judgments. The nine profiles are our research design, not an official O*NET scale or a validated prediction of career satisfaction.
Browse official occupations separately from the selected SIM career atlas. Candidate indices are preliminary; opening an occupation does not add it to the atlas.
Occupation tasks, work activities, skills, and context provide the core evidence for occupational demand patterns. The versioned candidate importer follows published task/activity links; independent crosswalk validation remains outstanding.
O*NET database and releasesSource-linked occupational summaries help reviewers judge the relevance of specific behaviors, rather than inferring scores from job titles.
Browse occupation evidenceCompare responsibilities, tools and problem-solving demands across specialties; preserve employer versus aggregator provenance. Advertisements are not a validated behavioral scale.
Employment projections, median pay and annual openings inform opportunity and accessibility. They do not determine the nine behavioral scores.
BLS employment projectionsPerson–job fit research motivates studying alignment between people's characteristics and occupational demands. It does not establish that SIM Ventures' nine specific dimensions, or an AI-based engagement, predict job fulfillment.
Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman & Johnson (2005): Person–environment fit meta-analysis
O*NET content model: distinction among tasks, work activities, work styles and interests
Project charter, methodology and nine-dimension crosswalk
18-career O*NET first-pass review and scoring concerns
18-career source-linked evidence register (CSV)
Repository audit and outstanding research requirements
GitHub documents require access to the private SIMWorkforce repository.
Import O*NET work-activity and task ratings with precise version and identifiers; establish a written 1–5 scoring rubric; link evidence to each occupation/dimension; independently review pilot scores; resolve disagreements and measure agreement. Only then consider extending reviewed scoring across all 180 occupations. Keep student interests and occupational opportunity separate from the behavior fingerprint.
The default view covers six target states. Choose all saved locations to inspect every imported job, including location mismatches. State filters use source location text rather than the requested search state. Title level describes the title; experience requirements are shown in job details. Every example has a best-fit career vertical. Compare employer requirements here with growth and openings in Explore Careers to identify promising education pathways. Career grouping does not change the original research scores.
| Career / role example | Employer | Career vertical | Location | Posted pay | Entry requirements |
|---|
Loading available occupations…
Choose a profile to sort by its candidate index, or search for a career. Open any career to see its nine-profile graph and source tasks. These are exploratory work-activity signals, not personal fit percentages.
Loading careers…
| Career | SOC | Research vertical | 2025 US employed (BLS) | Projected annual openings (BLS) | 2025–35 growth (BLS) | 2025 median wage |
|---|
Source guidance: BLS occupational employment estimates · BLS occupation projections · JOLTS hires by industry. These are different measurements. No nationwide counts are inferred from our six-state research sample. Official BLS employment, wage and projection metrics are shown for matching detailed SOC occupations. Refresh the full dataset with the documented BLS importer; unmatched roles display a dash. We do not display nationwide vacancy, internship, employer or hire counts without a reliable national dataset. BLS typical entry education is not a universal hiring requirement and is intentionally excluded.
Existing occupation research, retaining your current data. Job browsing now lives in Job Listings.
| SOC | Occupation | Vertical | Historical employers | Live approved employers |
|---|